Skip to main content

Regression Testing Common Challenges

Following are the four common challenges of regression testing:

1. It is considered to be quite complex: While the software development project is ongoing, the application of regression tests can tend to become complicated. In certain scenarios, there could be thousands of test cases, processes and functions that need to be checked, and it may become highly difficult or impossible for QA engineers to perform these tests manually. In order to solve this issue, certain companies might opt for automated regression testing.

2. A lot of resources are required: The concept of regression testing implies that it should be able to run after every development iteration. But, when it comes to justifying the time required for running the tests, it becomes a really difficult task to perform the testing process. In order to solve this issue, external teams or crowd testers or both can be held responsible for executing these test cases, which will, in turn, help relieve the internal testing team to some extent.

3. The acceptance of the development team: In the regression testing scenario, those tests that have previously passed are again being executed, which becomes difficult for the QA engineers and development teams to embrace. On the contrary, stakeholders and management might be more interested to pool in money and time to develop new features that may eventually lead to bringing in additional revenues.  

4. The value factor is undermined: There is no immediate value that can be gained from the application of regression testing. This is because the same features are retested over a period of time spanning months or years. Upon that, the testing team needs to justify spending a considerable amount of time conducting regression testing. Management will opt for alternate profitable solutions that can actually help in value creation and that is coming up with new and innovative features that may actually boost the brand value of the specific software application and thus make it more profitable over a period of time. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Key Activities of UAT

User Acceptance Testing (UAT) ensures that a product is made according to the customer requirements. The ultimate goal of a product is that it should work seamlessly in a real-time environment thereby offering the necessary services to be of worth in the marketplace. This testing method solidifies the testing process and makes the product robust and scalable. In this article, you will get to know the five activities of UAT.    What is User Acceptance Testing? In this testing method, end-users will take up the responsibility to test and evaluate the software application. The feedback provided by end-users will be analysed by the testing and development team to make any necessary changes and modifications for improving the quality of the software application. Following are the 5 key activities of UAT : 1. Initiate with a well-defined plan: Conducting User Acceptance Testing (UAT) in a feasible and rewarding manner requires implementing a well-defined plan of action. Information pertain
3 comments
Read more

Difference Between Regression Testing and Integration Testing

  What is regression testing? It is a testing method that is performed to ensure that despite making any changes, modifications and updations to the code, the existing functionalities of the software application are working as expected. The overall functionality and stability of the existing features are tested using this testing method. Test cases that have been already executed are partially or fully selected and then re-executed in order to make sure that the existing functionalities are working as expected. What is integration testing? It is a testing method where different software modules are validated based on how they function when they are combined, especially in terms of performance and effectiveness. The focus is on finding defects when these software modules that have been coded by different programmers interact with each other. How the data is being communicated amongst these modules is thoroughly checked.                 Difference between regression testing and
1 comment
Read more

5 reasons why Agile Methodology is better than Waterfall

IT deployments relied on the waterfall model and it worked really fine. But, with the advent of the agile model, the speed and agility of project development are taken to an all-new level, and thus businesses are steadily shifting their focus in adopting the agile methodology . The Waterfall model has some flaws where the dominance of agile wins. In this article, you will get to know about the five reasons as to why agile methodology is better than the waterfall model. What is agile methodology? It is a process where a project is broken down into several phases and each of these phases is developed in an iterative manner till a specific objective is attained. Teams collaborate and communicate constantly to discuss and work on the project’s progress. Stakeholders are constantly collaborated and continuous improvement takes place at every stage. Team members are properly assigned with their specific roles and responsibilities and simultaneously values, opportunities and problems are
Post a Comment
Read more