Regression Testing Common Challenges

Following are the four common challenges of regression testing:

1. It is considered to be quite complex: While the software development project is ongoing, the application of regression tests can tend to become complicated. In certain scenarios, there could be thousands of test cases, processes and functions that need to be checked, and it may become highly difficult or impossible for QA engineers to perform these tests manually. In order to solve this issue, certain companies might opt for automated regression testing.

2. A lot of resources are required: The concept of regression testing implies that it should be able to run after every development iteration. But, when it comes to justifying the time required for running the tests, it becomes a really difficult task to perform the testing process. In order to solve this issue, external teams or crowd testers or both can be held responsible for executing these test cases, which will, in turn, help relieve the internal testing team to some extent.

3. The acceptance of the development team: In the regression testing scenario, those tests that have previously passed are again being executed, which becomes difficult for the QA engineers and development teams to embrace. On the contrary, stakeholders and management might be more interested to pool in money and time to develop new features that may eventually lead to bringing in additional revenues.

4. The value factor is undermined: There is no immediate value that can be gained from the application of regression testing. This is because the same features are retested over a period of time spanning months or years. Upon that, the testing team needs to justify spending a considerable amount of time conducting regression testing. Management will opt for alternate profitable solutions that can actually help in value creation and that is coming up with new and innovative features that may actually boost the brand value of the specific software application and thus make it more profitable over a period of time.

Comments

The Best Automation Testing Tools in 2021

Software testing techniques have evolved over the year. Earlier, software testing was done manually which use to take a lot of time and human effort. But now software testing is done with the help of tools that make the testing process fast and reliable. Let us now take a look at some of the best testing tools that can be used for testing the software. What is automation testing? It is a software testing technique where test automation tools are used to automate the tests and generate test reports without any human intervention. This technique saves a lot of time and human effort to a great extent and makes the testing process fast, accurate and reliable as compared to manual testing. What are some of the best automation testing tools in 2021? Let’s now look at some of the best tools that can be used for automating the tests in the year 2021: Selenium: It is an open-source software testing tool for web applications. It supports all operating systems like Windows, MAC, Linux,...

5 Key Activities of UAT

User Acceptance Testing (UAT) ensures that a product is made according to the customer requirements. The ultimate goal of a product is that it should work seamlessly in a real-time environment thereby offering the necessary services to be of worth in the marketplace. This testing method solidifies the testing process and makes the product robust and scalable. In this article, you will get to know the five activities of UAT. What is User Acceptance Testing? In this testing method, end-users will take up the responsibility to test and evaluate the software application. The feedback provided by end-users will be analysed by the testing and development team to make any necessary changes and modifications for improving the quality of the software application. Following are the 5 key activities of UAT : 1. Initiate with a well-defined plan: Conducting User Acceptance Testing (UAT) in a feasible and rewarding manner requires implementing a well-defined plan of action. Infor...

Sanity testing Vs. Smoke testing: Understand the difference

Sanity testing and smoke testing have their own strategic value in the software development process. Though both these testing types are being confused at some point or the other, but, if a thorough study is done for both these testing types from a practical standpoint, then the testing team can truly leverage these two valuable testing methods. Both these testing types have their specific testing objectives and priorities that need to be met. In this article, you will get a brief idea about sanity and smoke testing and also the differences between both of them. What is sanity testing? When the software build is received, sanity testing is performed in order to ensure that the code changes that have been done are working as expected. This testing method evaluates whether the testing for a specified build can be done or not. The functionality of the application is validated. It decides whether a specific software product should go through end-to-end testing or not. A build is tested whe...

Search This Blog