Skip to main content

Sanity Testing Vs. Smoke Testing: Introduction and Differences

Smoke testing and sanity testing play a unique and insightful role in the software testing domain. Both these testing methods have specific priorities and objectives in the software development process. Smoke and sanity testing ensures that specific requirements in the software development stage are met. A comparable software build can be used by smoke and sanity testing in order to test strategically. Proper verification process of the software build can be carried out effectively and productively, due to which testing and development teams can work on their specific testing activities in a more planned and productive manner. 

In this article, you will get to know about the differences between smoke testing and sanity testing.

What is smoke testing? 

It is a testing method that determines the stability of a deployed software build. QA team gets the necessary confirmation through the smoke testing process to know whether to proceed further with testing activities or not. On each build, a minimal set of tests are run so that software functionalities can be tested. This testing method provides a platform to confirm that the product can be further tested.

Major issues or defects are detected in the early stages of the software development through the smoke testing method. It is designed to demonstrate conformance to requirements and system stability. The subsets of test cases are taken into consideration and then the testing team will see to that the test cases are run on the build.

 

What is sanity testing?


When the software build is received, sanity testing is performed in order to make sure that the code changes that have been introduced are working as expected. It acts as a checkpoint to ascertain whether the build can be further tested or not. The functionality of the application is validated through this testing process. Sanity testing is specifically performed on that build, where there is an immediate requirement for production deployment like a crucial bug fix.

If the sanity test fails, then the software build is rejected by the testing team and thus the software build has to pass the smoke test. This testing method is also known as a subset of regression testing. The accuracy of the components and newly added features are also validated.   

Difference between smoke testing and sanity testing:

Smoke testing

Sanity testing

This testing method is performed to determine the program’s crucial functionalities are working just fine or not

This testing method is performed to make sure that the new bugs/functionalities have been checked thoroughly and thus appropriately fixed

The aim of this testing is to make sure that the “stability” of the system is verified

The aim of this testing is to make sure that the “rationality” of the system is verified

Smoke testing can be performed by both testers and developers

Sanity testing is performed by only testers

The testing process is documented or scripted

The testing process is neither documented nor scripted

It is a subset of acceptance testing

It is a subset of regression testing

The entire system is tested from end-to-end

A specific component of the entire system is tested

Smoke testing can be performed either manually or through the use of automation tools

Sanity testing is usually performed manually

When a new product is being developed, smoke testing is performed

After the regression testing has been successfully completed. then sanity testing is performed

Conclusion: If you are looking forward to implementing smoke testing or sanity testing or both for your specific project, then do get connected with a premium software testing services UK that will provide result-oriented testing solutions in line with your project specific requirements.

About the author: I am a technical content writer focused on writing technology specific articles. I strive to provide well-researched information on the leading market savvy technologies.


 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Key Activities of UAT

User Acceptance Testing (UAT) ensures that a product is made according to the customer requirements. The ultimate goal of a product is that it should work seamlessly in a real-time environment thereby offering the necessary services to be of worth in the marketplace. This testing method solidifies the testing process and makes the product robust and scalable. In this article, you will get to know the five activities of UAT.    What is User Acceptance Testing? In this testing method, end-users will take up the responsibility to test and evaluate the software application. The feedback provided by end-users will be analysed by the testing and development team to make any necessary changes and modifications for improving the quality of the software application. Following are the 5 key activities of UAT : 1. Initiate with a well-defined plan: Conducting User Acceptance Testing (UAT) in a feasible and rewarding manner requires implementing a well-defined plan of action. Information pertain
3 comments
Read more

Difference Between Regression Testing and Integration Testing

  What is regression testing? It is a testing method that is performed to ensure that despite making any changes, modifications and updations to the code, the existing functionalities of the software application are working as expected. The overall functionality and stability of the existing features are tested using this testing method. Test cases that have been already executed are partially or fully selected and then re-executed in order to make sure that the existing functionalities are working as expected. What is integration testing? It is a testing method where different software modules are validated based on how they function when they are combined, especially in terms of performance and effectiveness. The focus is on finding defects when these software modules that have been coded by different programmers interact with each other. How the data is being communicated amongst these modules is thoroughly checked.                 Difference between regression testing and
1 comment
Read more

5 reasons why Agile Methodology is better than Waterfall

IT deployments relied on the waterfall model and it worked really fine. But, with the advent of the agile model, the speed and agility of project development are taken to an all-new level, and thus businesses are steadily shifting their focus in adopting the agile methodology . The Waterfall model has some flaws where the dominance of agile wins. In this article, you will get to know about the five reasons as to why agile methodology is better than the waterfall model. What is agile methodology? It is a process where a project is broken down into several phases and each of these phases is developed in an iterative manner till a specific objective is attained. Teams collaborate and communicate constantly to discuss and work on the project’s progress. Stakeholders are constantly collaborated and continuous improvement takes place at every stage. Team members are properly assigned with their specific roles and responsibilities and simultaneously values, opportunities and problems are
Post a Comment
Read more