It is a testing method that makes sure that the existing functionalities work just fine, despite making changes or updates in the code. A regression testing strategy ensures that regression is strategically implemented in a specific project to provide customer-centric results. The strategy makes sure that both customers and the business providing testing solutions are in a win-win situation. In this article, you will get to know the common problems with regression testing strategy.
Following
are the common problems with regression testing strategy:
1.
The cost is on the higher side: A high ongoing manpower cost can be
expected out of a manual regression testing method. In order to just run
regression tests, the costs are considered to be high. If automated regression
testing is applied, then the upfront costs related to tooling (open-source
tools are an alternative that are cost-effective), troubleshooting the
regression test suite and development should be considered.
Solution:
Risk-based testing can be used so that tests can be prioritized and those areas of the software can be focused upon that change frequently or are prone to defects. The development team should explain what are the changes or work they have done in the last release. Quality intelligence platforms can also be used.
2.
Delivers less value: Immediate value cannot be expected from
regression testing. On the other end, management is concerned as to why the
features that have been built for months or years are again being tested. They
are most focused on generating revenue, by developing new features that matter.
The testing team needs to properly justify the time spent on regression
testing.
Solution:
The team needs to educate the management as to how the bugs can be discovered early from one version to the next through the tactical implementation of regression testing. Upon that, development productivity and code quality are increased, time and effort are reduced for manual testers to a great extent.
3.
Issue with the time taken for conducting and executing the regression test: After every
development iteration, a regression test needs to be run. It may take a few
days or weeks to test a complex product manually (or even semi-manually). Even
if automated regression testing is applied, build times can be slowed down and
if they are not optimized, then it will become a bottleneck in the agile
feedback cycle.
Solution:
If automation is carried out in a proper
manner, then the ongoing costs can be reduced to an extent. There are specific
tools and best practices available that can reduce the build time from hours to
minutes. TIA (Test Impact Analysis) can be considered, which will execute only
the relevant tests from the regression test suite.
4. Considered to be laborious and mundane: The same tests are run over and over again in this testing method. Eventually, over a period of time, testers may lose interest in testing and hence might ignore, misinterpret and miss tests.
Solution:
Manual testing work can be reduced by
implementing automation. A shift-based approach can be used, where the testers
allotted to work on the testing process can work on a shift basis. Testers must
also know the long-term benefits of conducting regression testing and how the
quality of the product can be increased gradually. The team and management
should clearly understand the regression testing metrics, in order to drive the
performance in a streamlined manner. Boost the morale of regression testers and
provide certain benefits depending upon the organization’s standards.
Conclusion: If you are looking forward to
implementing regression testing for your specific project, then do get
connected with the finest Regression testing services that will provide
you with a feasible testing strategy that is in line with your project specific
requirements.
About the author: I am a technical content writer
focused on writing technology specific articles. I strive to provide
well-researched information on the leading market savvy technologies.
Comments
Post a Comment