Skip to main content

What is the difference between system and integration testing?

System testing and integration testing play a key role in the application’s software testing strategy. The key point to focus is on finding the right context to perform these testing methods. Both these testing methods provide a platform to improve the performance and quality of the software product or application. System testing is where the conduction of tests takes place to know if a complete build meets the functional and non-functional requirements. Integration testing is where two or more units or modules are integrated and tested to analyze their behavior in terms of how they perform when they are integrated. In this article, you will get to know the differences between system testing and integration testing.

What is System testing?

It is a testing method where a fully integrated software product or application is validated. The end-to-end system specifications are evaluated. A series of different tests are conducted so that the computer-based system is tested in its entirety. Those components that have been integrated are taken as inputs. Integration testing checks if there are any irregularities between the integrated units. Defects are detected by the system testing within both the whole system and the integrated units.

The whole system is tested in the context of functional requirement specifications or system requirement specifications or both. The system’s behavior and design are tested by the system testing method. System testing is performed after integration testing and before acceptance testing. The testing team does not require any specific programming skills to carry out this testing method. It also makes sure that the business and technical requirements of the client are met adequately. The testing team can carry out this testing method independently.

 

What is Integration testing?

It is a testing method in which the different components, modules or units of a software application are integrated and then their behavior is analyzed. It is the second phase/step of the Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC) process and is performed after unit testing. When a module is created by developers using differences in logic patterns, integration testing ensures that the system is not compromised.

Integration testing uses the Black-box testing technique. For example, when sign-up and login features are checked in an e-commerce application, they are viewed as separate units. If we check the ability to sign up or login after items are added by a user in their cart and want to proceed to the checkout, then the integration is checked between these two functionalities. This testing method uncovers defects that happen in the interaction between the software modules when they are integrated.    


Difference between system testing and integration testing:

System testing

Integration testing

It makes sure that the entire system is tested and is able to meet business specifications

It makes sure that two or more modules that have been integrated should be able to perform as expected

It comes under both functional and non-functional types of testing

It comes under the functional type of testing

The system’s internal structure is understood and analyzed

It obtains knowledge and information of just interlinked modules and their interaction

Functional, incremental and big-bang approaches are used in this testing method

Usability, regression, sanity, retesting, maintenance and performance tests are the approaches used in this testing method

Only the testing team is involved

Both the testing and development team is involved

Functional, security, reliability, scalability, usability testing etc., are some of the types of system testing

Top-down, Bottom-up, Big-bang and hybrid testing are the types of integration testing

The module’s behavior as a whole is tested

The interface between individual modules is tested

 

Conclusion: If you are looking forward to implementing system testing or integration testing or both for your specific project, then do get connected with a reputed software testing services company that will provide you with a viable testing blueprint that is in line with your project specific requirements.

About the author: I am a technical content writer focused on writing technology specific articles. I strive to provide well-researched information on the leading market savvy technologies.

 

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 reasons why Agile Methodology is better than Waterfall

IT deployments relied on the waterfall model and it worked really fine. But, with the advent of the agile model, the speed and agility of project development are taken to an all-new level, and thus businesses are steadily shifting their focus in adopting the agile methodology . The Waterfall model has some flaws where the dominance of agile wins. In this article, you will get to know about the five reasons as to why agile methodology is better than the waterfall model. What is agile methodology? It is a process where a project is broken down into several phases and each of these phases is developed in an iterative manner till a specific objective is attained. Teams collaborate and communicate constantly to discuss and work on the project’s progress. Stakeholders are constantly collaborated and continuous improvement takes place at every stage. Team members are properly assigned with their specific roles and responsibilities and simultaneously values, opportunities and problems are ...
Post a Comment
Read more

5 Key Activities of UAT

User Acceptance Testing (UAT) ensures that a product is made according to the customer requirements. The ultimate goal of a product is that it should work seamlessly in a real-time environment thereby offering the necessary services to be of worth in the marketplace. This testing method solidifies the testing process and makes the product robust and scalable. In this article, you will get to know the five activities of UAT.    What is User Acceptance Testing? In this testing method, end-users will take up the responsibility to test and evaluate the software application. The feedback provided by end-users will be analysed by the testing and development team to make any necessary changes and modifications for improving the quality of the software application. Following are the 5 key activities of UAT : 1. Initiate with a well-defined plan: Conducting User Acceptance Testing (UAT) in a feasible and rewarding manner requires implementing a well-defined plan of action. Infor...
3 comments
Read more

How To Develop A Test Automation Framework?

A test automation framework is a collection of processes and tools that are used to scale up the performance of automation testing. Various functions such as reusable modules, test data and libraries are integrated. It acts as a technical implementation guideline for automation testing and thus taking its performance to an all-new level. In this article, you will get a brief idea of how to develop a test automation framework. What is a test automation framework ? It consists of tools and a set of rules that are used to develop test cases. They are considered to be an integral part of the test automation process. Testing efforts and maintenance costs are reduced and the performance of QA teams can be optimized through the strategic implementation of test automation frameworks. Test automation framework contains guidelines pertaining to object repository, test-data handling and coding standards. When these guidelines are acted upon during automation scripting, productive outcomes like...
Post a Comment
Read more